This week at the ACLU of Maine: We joined a federal class action lawsuit on behalf of international students, we're taking action against potential attacks on trans student athletes, and we're pushing back on ICE activity in Maine.

ACLU of Maine Files Joint Class Action to Defend International Students

We sued Trump -- again. This time, for illegally terminating the legal status of hundreds of international students.

Late last week, the ACLU of Maine joined the ACLUs of New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont in a federal class action lawsuit to represent over 100 students who have had their F-1 student immigration status unlawfully and abruptly terminated.

These sudden terminations of F-1 student immigration status, which have been happening across the country since at least early March, circumvent the law and strip students of their rights to due process. The president's illegal actions are bad for students, colleges and universities, and Maine communities. One Maine student told us that after their status was abruptly terminated, they had to stop going to class and their job at a Maine-based company.

However, the Trump administration announced on Friday, April 25, that it would reinstate international students’ Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) records, which are necessary for studying in the United States. The administration says it will now develop a “framework” for visa terminations. It is too soon to tell how Friday's developments may impact our lawsuit. We will need to confirm if people whose status was terminated, but who have not sued the government, have actually had their student status fully reactivated.

Friday's actions are the latest example of the destructive chaos coming from the Trump administration, which is upending lives throughout the nation – not to mention the underlying attacks on due process. That same morning, we were on a call with a Department of Justice attorney scheduling the next steps in our case against these illegal terminations. Later that afternoon, the administration claimed it would reverse course. This chaos is causing a great deal of uncertainty, keeping people from making important decisions about their lives, families, educations, and businesses – and it leaves many people fearing they may be detained or deported at any time.

We're joining this lawsuit to fight not just for immigrants' rights -- but for academic freedom, fairness, and the values that define our state.

Learn more about the case

 

Tell Maine Lawmakers to Stop the Attacks on Trans Students

This week, we launched an action so you can urge lawmakers to OPPOSE bills attacking trans students' rights. In just over 24 hours, nearly 400 people sent messages to their legislators asking them to uphold the protections guaranteed to us by the Maine Human Rights Act. Add your name now.

The Maine Human Rights Act was first adopted in 1971. Lawmakers expanded it in 2005 to include gender identity under the definition of sexual orientation, ensuring all students can participate fully in school life – including school sports – without fear of discrimination. This expansion was reaffirmed by Maine voters in a referendum.

Help us tell Maine lawmakers that banning trans girls from school sports is a dangerous rollback of our state's values. We cannot afford to open the door to invasive scrutiny of children's bodies and attacks on our right to live authentically and control our own bodies.

TELL LAWMAKERS TO OPPOSE TRANS ATHLETE BANS

 

ACLU of Maine Testifies Against Maine Law Enforcement Supporting "Mass Deportation" Efforts

On Friday, we were in Augusta testifying against a bill that would require state and local law enforcement to support federal immigration authorities.

The bill would open up local law enforcement to expensive litigation when enforcement actions violate people's civil rights, undermine community trust in law enforcement, and incentivize racial profiling by allowing law enforcement to detain anyone suspected of being a non-citizen. 

LD 1656 makes local governments accountable to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, instead of Maine voters. It would take valuable resources that should be used to address local needs, and it would erode trust in local law enforcement. When police departments detain people simply due to their alleged immigration status, they create an environment in which those community members are afraid to call for help, report crimes, share evidence, or testify in trials. 

The bill also exposes local law enforcement to expensive litigation and liability. To comply with federal "immigration detainer" requests, local law enforcement would be asked to imprison people without proper due process or probable cause, violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Our towns cannot afford the risk of substantial legal and financial liabilities that would come as a result of illegal federal actions.

We'll keep you updated on this bill as it moves through the legislature.

Read our Testimony 

 

Relevant Reads

• Portland Press Herald: Roux Institute student had their visa terminated, ACLU confirms
• Portland Press Herald: Maine’s public defense system gets $3.5M boost, without governor’s support
• Maine Morning Star: Lawmakers revisit bills to ensure diverse histories are taught in Maine schools

*indicates name changed to protect identity

The U.S. Department of Education (ED) has historically worked to ensure that all students have equal access to quality public education. In February, the ED departed from its role of protecting students’ civil rights. In its February 14th “Dear Colleague Letter,” the ED threatened to revoke federal funding from any educational institution that engages in what it described as “illegal” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) work. However, the ED has not defined what it considers to be “illegal DEI” and, from preschool to higher ed, its vague prohibitions in the letter are making it harder for educators, administrators, and students to deliver on and receive an education that explores a wide range of perspectives – including students’ own lived experiences – and encourages critical thinking.

The letter states that any undefined diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI, practices are unlawful. It requires educators to act now to revise their lessons or suffer complaints, investigations, and the loss of vital federal funding. The letter failed to follow legal procedures for issuing such demands. If enforced, public schools and universities nationwide could be punished simply for teaching standard topics, like American history, or creating classrooms where each student feels safe to discuss the reality of our lives. Threats that the letter may be enforced have already caused teachers to self-censor.

But the ED does not have the authority to control what schools teach. Educators must be free to design lessons that give students the complete education they deserve, including those that teach history honestly and celebrate diversity. On March 5th, the ACLU, alongside our New Hampshire and Massachusetts affiliates, as well as the National Education Association (NEA), sued the ED on behalf of NEA, NEA-NH, and the Center for Black Educator Development to stop the ED’s unconstitutional intrusion on free speech and academic freedom. Several New Hampshire School Districts have also joined to assert their rights and protect their students.

“It’s clear that the Trump administration is trying to shut down speech it doesn’t like — especially when it deals with race in our educational institutions,” says Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU. “The ‘Dear ColleagueLetter’ is a brazen attempt to intimidate schools into abandoning lawful efforts to create inclusive learning environments.”

The educators represented in our suit against the ED said they felt like the “Dear Colleague Letter” instigated a “witch hunt” against them. Teachers who have dedicated their lives to helping every student grow into their full potential now fear losing their jobs and teaching licenses if they do not severely restrict what they and their students say and do in their classrooms.

Jordan*, an AP English teacher, describes feeling like their hands are tied. To keep students engaged and prepared for the AP exam, Jordan encourages them to connect older texts to their lived experiences and current events — an approach backed by state certification standards. But under the ED’s letter, even the most thoughtful lesson plans can be misunderstood as a violation of its guidelines. Jordan is now afraid that by allowing discussions of sexism, racism, or colonialism, even when students introduce them, they risk being accused of indoctrination.

“I don’t tell my students what to think,” Jordan says. “That is not teaching. I fear they are losing valuable analytical training and preparation for college if they cannot generate their own opinions on challenging works from our past and connect them to their world today.”

Taylor*, an assistant professor whose research focuses on Indigenous narratives, is already self-censoring. The ED’s vague rules have them worried that topics vital for understanding history and different viewpoints, like colonialism and feminist theory, could be wrongly seen as discriminatory. “As long as the letter is effective,” Taylor notes, “I cannot fully perform my role as an educator and speak freely on these critical topics.”

This self-censorship hurts students. Taylor has always encouraged students to draw on their lived experiences when engaging with course materials. But now, they are hesitant to invite those reflections or even respond to them in class. “I am committed to hearing all my students’ voices,” Taylor explains. “I am concerned that this commitment will become illegal.”

Taylor’s experience is but one of the inevitable consequences of Trump’s war on allegedly “woke” concepts. Since 2020, Trump and other anti-public education extremists have banned books and censored programs and curriculum that address systematic racism and sexism. The ACLU and our partners challenged these three of these efforts, but today, anti-DEI efforts remain the latest effort to erase marginalized communities.

For Billie*, a special education professor, after the Dear Colleague Letter was issued, their university ordered faculty to remove all references to DEI from course descriptions, including words like “disability,” “inclusion,” and “culturally responsive.”

Billie is concerned about the ability to meet the needs of special education students who are diverse in many ways, or share with students materials about the history of the disability rights movement and the fight for inclusion. These changes also conflict with national standards for special education teachers that Billie has prepared students to meet. They, too, come at a moment when schools across the country face a critical shortage of special education teachers. “If we can’t train teachers to meet the needs of diverse learners,” Billie warns, “students with disabilities will suffer.”

That impact is already being felt by the next generation of educators. Jesse*, a student teacher, has had their courses revised because of the ED’s letter, and describes feeling a decline in the quality of their education. Among other changes, their university is removing its education DEI course, taking away critical tools for supporting students from different backgrounds. Jesse lives in a city with a large immigrant population from Mexico and West Africa. They only want to be sure that their future students “can see themselves in the learning and feel welcome in class,” they say. But now, without coursework on cultural understanding and responsiveness, they worry that they will not be fully prepared to do this.

“We’re urging the court to block the Department of Education from enforcing this harmful and vague directive and protect students from politically motivated attacks that stifle speech and erase critical lessons. Teaching should be guided by what’s best for students, not by threat of illegal restrictions and punishment,” said middle school teacher and president of the National Education Association, Becky Pringle.

When schools cannot teach about the world — including the histories and lived experiences of people of different races, genders, and abilities — students lose the chance to understand themselves, relate to others, and thrive in a diverse society. DEI initiatives allow students to hear a full range of perspectives, even those some anti-public education politicians don’t like.

At the ACLU, we know that classrooms must be shaped by the needs of students, not political agendas or vague legal threats. For more than a century, we have fought federal overreach to silence free speech. We will not back down now.