Freedom of Expression

The ACLU of Maine is committed to protecting and expanding First Amendment freedoms through its work on a variety of issues including political protest, online expression and journalists' rights.

Freedom of Expression Collage

What you need to know

1920s

Since the 1920s, the ACLU has been involved in virtually all of the landmark speech cases to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

1933

A nationwide ban on "Ulysses," a novel by James Joyce, was lifted in 1933 following an ACLU challenge.

1997

In a landmark 1997 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the ACLU’s argument that the Internet itself is a free-speech zone.

Our client was blocked from a public event in Bangor, simply for criticizing Vice President Vance online. We're suing.

Freedom of speech, the press, association, assembly, and petition: This set of guarantees, protected by the First Amendment, comprises what we refer to as freedom of expression. It is the foundation of a vibrant democracy, and without it, other fundamental rights, like the right to vote, would wither away.

The ACLU of Maine is committed to protecting and expanding First Amendment freedoms that allow people to speak their minds, challenge those in power, protest injustice, and fully participate in democracy.

We work in the courts, at the State House, and with communities across Maine to defend these rights. We challenge government censorship and retaliation, educate people on their right to protest and demonstrate, defend free speech in schools and public institutions, and fight efforts to restrict access to books, ideas, and information.

Freedom of expression is the matrix, the indispensable condition, of nearly every other form of freedom.

—

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo in Palko v. Connecticut

Featured Cases

Know Your Rights: Freedom of Expression

The Latest

News & Commentary
McGonigle v Curran

Purr-Suing Justice So @CatsOnACouch Attend a Vice-Presidential Event in Brewer

After V.P. Vance announced a vice-presidential event in Brewer, we immediately asked the federal court for a preliminary injunction requiring the government to let Amanda McGonigle attend.
Press Release
McGonigle v. Curran

CatsOnACouch Creator Asks Court to Allow Her to Attend Upcoming Vance Events

Amanda McGonigle was prohibited from attending a taxpayer-funded event with Vice President Vance earlier this year in retaliation for her social media account mocking the VP.
Issue Areas: Freedom of Expression, Government Transparency
Court Cases: McGonigle v. Curran – Free Speech at Government Events
News & Commentary
Free Speech Sign

Students and Faculty Have the Right to Speak Without Fear

We're asking a federal court to ensure that students and faculty on college campuses can engage in free speech without fear of retaliation.
News & Commentary
A photos of demonstrators in Minneapolis filming federal agents.

Your Questions Answered: Filming ICE Interactions Safely

Despite government attacks against protesters and the press, documenting interactions with law enforcement and federal agents is protected by the First Amendment. ACLU experts break down what you need to know.

Cases, Campaigns & Legislation

    • Cases
    • Campaigns (0)
    • Legislations (0)
Court Case
Aug 13, 2026

AAUP v. Rubio – Freedom of Association

The federal government has targeted noncitizen students and faculty by arresting, detaining, and deporting them in retaliation for their pro-Palestinian activism. This is a coordinated attempt to chill their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and assembly.
Court Case
Jul 21, 2026

Harvard v. Health and Human Services – Academic Freedom

The federal government threatened to withhold billions of dollars in research funding from Harvard University after the school refused to adopt the government’s preferred ideological approach to who it admits to study, who it employs to teach, and what classes and other programs it offers.
Court Case
Aug 21, 2026

McGonigle v. Curran – Free Speech at Government Events

The government cannot ban people from public events just because elected officials can't handle their jokes. We’re suing the federal government for retaliating against our client by blocking her from an official, taxpayer-funded public event simply because she criticizes Vice President Vance online.
Court Case
Feb 27, 2026

Hussey v. Cambridge – Free Speech of Public Employees

We filed an amicus brief urging a federal appeals court to apply the correct test to determine if a Massachusetts police officer’s comments are protected by the First Amendment.