Communications Director Sam Crankshaw

Samuel Crankshaw

Communications Director

he/him

The Trump administration is attempting to force states to hand over voters' sensitive, private data. The U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) actions threaten the privacy and security of voters’ personal information and risk its misuse by the federal government for mass disenfranchisement.

Last December, the federal government sued the State of Maine for refusing to hand over unredacted voter data. We filed a friend-of-the-court brief and argued in person before the federal court in Maine. We urged the court to dismiss the case and highlighted how DOJ's demands violate federal voting rights law and state privacy law. Earlier this summer, the district court dismissed the lawsuit, blocking DOJ's attempted overreach.

But then the federal government appealed its loss to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

This week, we filed a new friend-of-the-court brief urging the appeals court to uphold the district court's ruling. This brief argues the administration is not stating the true purpose for requesting the sensitive voter data and intends to unlawfully construct a national voter database to disenfranchise voters.

Our work is part of a national strategy to protect voter information. Nationally, the ACLU has engaged in 26 similar cases in other states, and secretaries of state across the political spectrum are protecting their voter rolls from this attempted overreach.

Our brief details “that the supposed purpose offered by the United States is pretextual,” outlining attempts by DOJ to gain unprecedented access and control over state voter lists. It cites “government documents [indicating] how the United States ultimately plans to use voters’ sensitive personal data: to assert control over voting eligibility in the states, to order the disenfranchisement of voters, and potentially to contest the results of state-run elections.” The brief further explains that “[c]onsistent with extensive public reporting,” the government “has now admitted in open court that it will use and share the gathered information with agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security, thus potentially facilitating immigration investigations.”

The unredacted voter file includes many sensitive details about Maine voters, including birth dates, driver’s license numbers, and parts of Social Security numbers. Maine voters shared this information with the state so they could exercise their right to vote, but they never agreed to let the federal government abuse that information to silence their voices.

The Trump administration’s attempted overreach and plans to create a national voter database clearly violate the U.S. Constitution, federal voting rights law, and state privacy law. Maine elections are free, safe, and secure – and we’ll keep fighting to protect our fundamental voting rights even as the president continues to weaponize DOJ against the American people.

Read more about this case and see relevant court documents here.

Related Content


News & Commentary
May 21, 2026
Person holding protest sign reading "protect your vote."
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Trump Wants Maine Voters' Private Data. A Federal Court Just Stopped Him.

A U.S. district court has dismissed the federal government's lawsuit, blocking its demand for full access to Maine voters' sensitive personal information.
Press Release
Aug 25, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU of Maine Urges Federal Appeals Court to Protect Maine Voter Data

The brief argues the Trump administration has not stated the true purpose for requesting sensitive voter data.
Issue Areas: Voting Rights, Privacy
Press Release
May 21, 2026
Person holding homemade protest sign reading "vote light your rights depend on it!"
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Federal Court Dismisses DOJ Attempt to Access Maine’s Unredacted Voter File

The U.S. District Court ruled the federal government cannot compel the State of Maine to release sensitive voter information.
Issue Areas: Voting Rights, Privacy
Court Case
Aug 25, 2026
An individuals holding a sign saying "Voting Rights Are For People Not Parties," outside of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of arguments in the Voting Rights case Callais v. Landry.
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

United States v. Bellows – Protecting Sensitive Voter Data

We're challenging the federal government’s attempt to access Maine’s unredacted voter file – including information like voters’ Social Security and driver’s license numbers.