Media Contact

SAMUEL CRANKSHAW

Communications Director, ACLU of Maine
[email protected]
(646) 820-4548 (call/text)

An ordinance passed Monday threatens free speech rights and targets unhoused residents under the guise of public safety.

Bangor City Council on Monday passed an ordinance that threatens free speech rights and targets unhoused residents under the guise of public safety. The ordinance will ban people from being on certain medians and impose fines of up to $2,500, even if they are not creating a safety hazard.

“People have a right to exist and interact with others in public spaces,” said ACLU of Maine Legal Director Carol Garvan. “Public spaces, such as streets and parks, are essential places for debate, discussion, and communication.”

“Bangor already has two ordinances that constrain people’s ability to express themselves on city streets and sidewalks,” added Garvan. “The city cannot ban people from certain medians, tell them they can express themselves elsewhere, and then rely on a different ordinance to suppress their speech in that second space. Taken together, Bangor’s ordinances will make it extremely hard for people to express themselves in public. These ordinances will also disproportionately silence and entangle the city’s unhoused residents in the legal system.”

Other laws that target unhoused residents and threaten free speech have been struck down in state and federal courts, including a Portland ordinance adopted in 2013. In 2014, a federal appeals court struck down Portland’s “median ban” following a lawsuit from the ACLU of Maine and Goodwin Procter LLP. Portland spent $175,000 in taxpayer dollars defending its unconstitutional policy. Numerous other cities have spent thousands after courts reversed unconstitutional ordinances restricting activities in public spaces, including Manchester and Hudson, NH, Albuquerque, NM, Lexington, KY, Cranston, RI, and Fall Rivers, MA.

Additionally, criminalizing this peaceful conduct in public spaces ignores the root causes of homelessness and makes it even more difficult for people to regain housing. Many people with limited resources cannot pay fines and become further entangled in the legal system, which imposes even greater barriers to housing and employment. Attempting to punish people out of poverty is the least effective and most expensive response to this growing housing crisis. According to a wide body of research, increasing access to housing, health care, and education reduces homelessness rates and saves taxpayer dollars.

"Public spaces belong to the public, not the government,” concluded Garvan. “City governments should not be in the business of banning speech in long-standing forums for public dialogue.”

Related Content

News & Commentary
Jun 05, 2024
Person holding poster reading "housing is a human right."
  • Criminal Legal Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Without Alternative Shelter, Sleeping in Public is a Life-Sustaining Act

No matter the Supreme Court's decision in the Grants Pass case, Portland’s leaders can choose to address the root causes of homelessness.
News & Commentary
Jun 29, 2024
Person holding sign reading "homelessness ends with a home"
  • Criminal Legal Reform

Solving homelessness demands a human response, not crime and punishment

Home is a refuge, a shelter, a place of safety and belonging. Despite the vulnerability of being unhoused, the Supreme Court has now made life even more dangerous for the 650,000 unhoused Americans and increased the risks for millions more who are living on the edge and housing-insecure.
Press Release
Jun 28, 2024
2024 April_Monument Square Rally During SCOTUS Grants Pass Arguments
  • Criminal Legal Reform

Supreme Court Rules Cities Can Punish People For Being Homeless Even When Shelters Are Full

The court has opened the door for cities to punish people for trying to survive, but Maine cities must address root causes instead.
Issue Areas: Criminal Legal Reform