A few weeks ago,
I blogged on a story from Iowa that shocked me:
Well, now the state of Utah is considering legislation that would criminalize actions such as this woman’s accidental fall. The legislation would criminalize
“any intentional, knowing or reckless acts by a woman against her unborn child” and as a result, “a woman guilty of criminal homicide of her fetus could be punished by up to life in prison”. Proponents of the legislation think that the standard of “intentional, knowing or reckless acts” is clear enough that miscarriages would be exempt from investigation, but as Nancy Northrup of the Center for Reproductive Rights notes,
It is chilling to observe this persistent pattern of increased suspicion towards pregnant women and the assumption that they are neither entitled not competent to make their own reproductive health care choices. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg spoke to such cultural attitudes in an
interview the New York Times Magazine last summer . Here is the exchange:
Q: Since we are talking about abortion, I want to ask you about Gonzales v. Carhart, the case in which the court upheld a law banning so-called partial-birth abortion. Justice Kennedy in his opinion for the majority characterized women as regretting the choice to have an abortion, and then talked about how they need to be shielded from knowing the specifics of what they’d done. You wrote, “This way of thinking reflects ancient notions about women’s place in the family and under the Constitution.” I wondered if this was an example of the court not quite making the turn to seeing women as fully autonomous.
JUSTICE GINSBURG: The poor little woman, to regret the choice that she made. Unfortunately there is something of that in Roe. It’s not about the women alone. It’s the women in consultation with her doctor. So the view you get is the tall doctor and the little woman who needs him.
The ACLU has filed a friend of the court brief in
Burton v. Florida , where Samantha Burton, a pregnant woman in Florida was given medical orders, including forced bed rest, through the courts. Dahlia Ward of the ACLU describes the dangerous precedent posed in this case best when she says:
Unfortunately, the slippery slope arguments Dahlia refers to actually come to fruition in this
proposed Utah bill . It is not the government’s prerogative to investigate the circumstances of women’s pregnancies with the threat of criminal charges. The ACLU will continue to fight for the autonomy of women to make their own choices about their body, including their pregnancies and reproductive health care.