Maine AG Weighs in on Free Speech

By staff and wire reports Maine Attorney General Janet Mills said today that free speech concerns prompted the state’s decision not to join a widely supported court filing on behalf of a father whose son’s military funeral attracted anti-gay protestors. Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia joined in a friend-of-the court brief Tuesday in support of Albert Snyder, who filed suit against Westboro Baptist Church and its leader, Fred Phelps. Maine, along with Virginia, declined to participate in the case. Mills said in a statement that the actions Phelps and his followers were “offensive and outrageous, but the First Amendment does

Placeholder image

A Day In Court For Torture Victims

Yest

Placeholder image

Supreme Court Issues Worrisome Miranda Ruling

Toda

Placeholder image

Don't Be Fooled - "Freedom of Access" Means Just That...ACCESS

Placeholder image

Progress on "DADT" Repeal, Just in Time for Memorial Day

Placeholder image

A Legal Black Hole

Rece

Placeholder image

Help Us Urge Senator Collins to Repeal DADT

The

Placeholder image

Mary Beth Tinker Was Right

"While many try to keep their heads down and avoid the problem, Danielle Smith decided to do something about it. Even before entering Mount Ararat High School in Topsham, she got involved with the school’s gay-straight alliance. Later, she took an active role in the southern Maine chapter of the national Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. 'I feel passionately everyone should have the same rights,' said Smith, 17, who is straight. 'And I’ve been lucky enough to know some older students who felt the same way, who were sort of mentors to me.'" At the ACLU of MAINE's annual dinner, Mary Beth Tinker, plaintiff in the landmark Supreme Court C

Placeholder image

If Only Torture Were Really Ending.

Tonight is the Series Finale of 24. There was a time when I was a consistent viewer of this show, before my nerve-endings got the better of me and I realized I couldn’t fall asleep on the nights I watched the show.   But over the years, I stopped taking 24 for pure entertainment value and became a little disturbed by the constant use of torture for doomsday scenarios where a clock is literally ticking and the only way to save the country is by employing torture techniques to find out where the bomb or nuclear weapon is being hidden. And Jack Bauer always saves the day, so the torture is always worth it. Last fall, Glenn Greenwald spoke with a writer of Law & Order, who admonished other TV writers for their irresponsible embrace of torture, which you can read here. Shows like 24 perpetuate the public misperception that torture is both effective and an appropriate law enforcement strategy. In reality, it is neither.   These arguments play out in reality. I’ve heard first hand people saying torture must be allowed for such doomsday scenarios. The reality is that torture conducted under the auspices of “enhanced interrogation techniques” beginning in 2002 did not occur under doomsday scenarios, and they should not happen under any scenario. This 2005 article in The New Yorker  is a helpful reminder of what happened at Abu Ghraib.   So 24 may be ending, which I know is disappointing to many fans, but what really disappoints me is that the Bush-era tactics romanticized on the show still persevere. Predator drones, detention without charge or trial, proposed changes to Miranda rules, surveillance, and terrorist watch lists are currently used as national security measures. We may not see these tactics play out in our day to day lives, but that does not mean they are not employed.

Placeholder image