Communication Fellow Maggie Nugent

Maggie Nugent

Communications Fellow

she/her

Staff Attorney Anahita Sotoohi

Anahita Sotoohi

Staff Attorney

she/her

When the government blocked our client from J.D. Vance’s official events because of her online cat jokes, we sued.

In a victory for the First Amendment, the government declared that our client, Amanda McGonigle, will be allowed to attend official vice-presidential events on the same terms as anyone else. The government also confirmed that it won’t deny entry to anyone else over their protected speech.

Amanda, who created and runs the social media accounts @CatsOnACouch, sued after she was barred from entering a vice-presidential event in Bangor simply because she uses her accounts to make fun of Vice President Vance to her millions of followers. After the government told the court that Amanda – and other members of the public – will not be excluded from official vice-presidential events based on their protected speech, Amanda voluntarily asked the court to dismiss the case.

A senior official in the Office of the Vice President said in court documents that “[a]ttendees will not be prevented from attending official events based on protected expression or speech.”

Because of Amanda’s courage in filing this lawsuit, we have the government on the record loud and clear: They will not exclude people from public, taxpayer-funded events simply for making fun of public officials online.

When Amanda was denied entry to the Vice President’s event in Bangor, an armed Secret Service agent and other officials called her out by name and told her she was not allowed to enter, saying, “We know where you stand.” This was a clear example of retaliation and viewpoint-based discrimination because of her online criticism. Elected officials cannot penalize Amanda, or anyone else, simply because they cannot take a joke.

Regardless of who is in power, we all have the right to speak our minds without fear of government retaliation. Humor, mockery, and political satire have been important ways for people to express themselves, challenge those in power, and participate in democracy since our nation’s founding. The First Amendment protects that right for all of us.

Related Content


Court Case
Oct 6, 2026
McGonigle v. Curran
  • Freedom of Expression|
  • +1 Issue

McGonigle v. Curran – Free Speech at Government Events

The government cannot ban people from public events just because elected officials can't handle their jokes. We’re suing the federal government for retaliating against our client by blocking her from an official, taxpayer-funded public event simply because she criticizes Vice President Vance online.
News & Commentary
Jul 07, 2026
McGonigle v Curran
  • Freedom of Expression|
  • +1 Issue

Our Latest Claw-suit to Purr-tect the First Amendment

Just because some elected officials can’t take a joke doesn’t mean the government can ban people from making them.
News & Commentary
Aug 21, 2026
McGonigle v Curran
  • Freedom of Expression|
  • +1 Issue

Purr-Suing Justice So @CatsOnACouch Attend a Vice-Presidential Event in Brewer

After V.P. Vance announced a vice-presidential event in Brewer, we immediately asked the federal court for a preliminary injunction requiring the government to let Amanda McGonigle attend.
Press Release
Aug 21, 2026
McGonigle v. Curran
  • Freedom of Expression|
  • +1 Issue

CatsOnACouch Creator Asks Court to Allow Her to Attend Upcoming Vance Events

Amanda McGonigle was prohibited from attending a taxpayer-funded event with Vice President Vance earlier this year in retaliation for her social media account mocking the VP.